SOP 03: Scope & Engagement Definition
Translate the project context identified during the Discovery Conversation into a structured service scope and an internally consistent fee basis. Aligned with ISO requirements on determining customer requirements, feasibility, and capacity planning.
Version 2.0
SOP 03: Scope & Engagement Definition
Standard Operating Procedure
Purpose
Translate the project context identified during the Discovery Conversation into a structured service scope and an internally consistent fee basis. Aligned with ISO requirements on determining customer requirements, feasibility, and capacity planning.
Scope
Applies to all qualified inquiries that have completed a Project Discovery Conversation. Responsible parties: CEO and Project Director. Admin supports document organisation.
Inputs
- Discovery Summary
- Documents received from the client (drawings, budgets, schedules)
- Internal service definitions (PM, CM, QS, Design Advisory)
- Current fee structure and pricing logic
Outputs
- Draft scope of services
- Internal fee calculation notes
- Defined list of assumptions and exclusions
- Decision to proceed to Engagement Proposal
Procedure Steps
- Review the Discovery Summary and any client documents to confirm completeness and identify missing items.
- Map client needs to Chenla’s service pathways: PM, CM, QS, Design Advisory, or a combination.
- Draft the preliminary scope, clearly distinguishing core activities from optional add-ons.
- Identify constraints, risks, and required clarifications based on ISO feasibility and capacity considerations.
- Calculate fees using the standard pricing logic (effort, complexity, risk level, and required resources).
- Document assumptions and exclusions to ensure transparency and avoid scope drift.
- Review the draft scope and fee logic internally with the Project Director or CEO for alignment and approval.
- If gaps or inconsistencies remain, return to the client for clarification before moving to the Engagement Proposal.
Quality Checks
- Draft scope must align with the Discovery Summary with no contradictions.
- Fee basis must reference effort, complexity, and risk, not arbitrary values.
- Assumptions and exclusions must be explicitly documented.
- ISO feasibility criteria must be addressed before approving the scope.
Records
- Scope Definition Worksheet in Canopy
- Internal Fee Calculation Notes
- Clarification Requests (if any)
Notes / Exceptions
- PM/CM/QS hybrid scopes must explicitly state division of responsibility to avoid overlap.
- If the client appears unsure about their true needs, a paid Advisory Phase may be recommended before full engagement.
Document Control
Version: 2.0
Revision History
- 2024-09-17, Initial release defining structured scoping and internal fee justification process. (MV)
- 2026-05-15, Refresh to v2.0. Original v1.0 (2024-09-17) referenced ERPNext as the system of record; this revision updates the references to Canopy, the internal platform we now use for project and client records. SOP renamed from 'Scope Mapping & Fee Strategy' to 'Scope & Engagement Definition' and category changed from 'Onboarding' to 'Project Engagement'. Steps unchanged. Quarterly review cadence established going forward; next review 2026-08-15. (MV)